After more research,
AND CONSIDERING THE SOURCE'S AGENDA, Reija and I found this to be intriguing and furthermore have seen some pretty serious websites that condtradict the
"757 plane hitting the Pentagon" theory. It's pretty interesting that the entire plane is missing, there is NO damage from wings hitting it and that there was damage to the 3rd ring of the Pentagon in the form of a round hole that is about 10 feet in diameter. Also found on some of these websites, the amount of damage that the Pentagon suffered was minor compared to other similar plane crashes.
If you do further research, you see some info on Rumsfeld slipping up in one of his press confs. Here is the text:
Donald Rumsfeld:
"It is a truth that a terrorist can attack any time, any place, using any technique and it's physically impossible to defend at every time and every place against every conceivable technique. Here we're talking about plastic knives and using an American Airlines flight filled with our citizens, and the missile to damage this building and similar (inaudible) that damaged the World Trade Center. The only way to deal with this problem is by taking the battle to the terrorists, wherever they are, and dealing with them."
The most comprehensive website I saw regarding this subject
is located right here. (this is a serious Bush Bashing site antiwar supporting site)
Originally Posted by
KittySkyfish
I don't have much of an opinion, given that this source is just another form of media entertainment. I did some very brief research and the first sight that also supports the conflicting information is one that also supports "inside job" theories.
Balance check: We're 60-some days before the elections and this wasn't a major focus in the 9/11 commission hearings.